Categories
Blog

SPAC vs IPO vs Direct Listing: Which to Choose?

SPAC vs IPO vs Direct Listing: Which to Choose?

When a private company decides to go public and list its shares on the stock market, it has several options to consider. The most common methods include an Initial Public Offering (IPO), a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC), or a Direct Listing. 

 

Each of these methods has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this article, we will explore the differences between these approaches to help you determine which one might be the right choice for your company.

 

IPO: High Profile, High Cost

An IPO, or Initial Public Offering, is the most traditional way for a company to go public. 

 

In this process, the company creates additional shares, which are underwritten by an investment bank acting as an intermediary. The bank charges a fee to the company and works closely to ensure the IPO’s success.

 

To proceed with an IPO, a company must meet various regulatory requirements, including submitting a detailed registration statement (Form S-1) to the SEC. 

 

This statement provides up-to-date financial information and other data necessary for investors to evaluate the company’s prospects.

 

The investment bank helps set an initial offer price for the shares and then purchases those shares from the company. These shares are then sold to retail and institutional investors through various distributors, including other investment banks, mutual funds, and insurance companies.

 

The IPO process also involves a roadshow, which is similar to a marketing campaign. The primary goal of the roadshow is to generate interest and demand for the company’s shares. 

 

The underwriter evaluates the success of the roadshow in capturing investor attention, helping set a realistic IPO price.

 

Two common methods of distributing shares to prospective investors are book-building and auctioning. Both have their own processes and considerations.

 

Moreover, IPOs come with significant costs, as underwriting fees can range between 3.5% and 7% of the offering total. This can result in substantial expenses for the company, particularly if it raises a significant amount of capital.

 

Lastly, IPO shares typically have a lockup period, meaning they cannot be sold for a specified time after the IPO, typically lasting between 90 to 180 days.

 

SPAC: A Unique Approach

SPAC vs IPO

A Special Purpose Acquisition Company, or SPAC, is also known as a blank check company. SPACs have gained popularity in recent years. 

 

A SPAC is formed as a company with no commercial operations, and its sole purpose is to raise funds through an IPO, intending to acquire or merge with an existing company.

 

SPACs are generally created by individuals with expertise in a specific sector. The funds raised during the SPAC’s IPO are placed in a trust account, to be used exclusively for completing an acquisition. 

 

If a SPAC fails to identify a target company within a specified period, it is liquidated, and the funds are returned to investors.

Unlike an IPO, a SPAC listing process is typically faster, often taking just a few months to complete. Promoters of the target company may negotiate a premium valuation as the deal must be concluded within a specific timeframe. 

 

If well-known executives back the SPAC, it can benefit from an experienced team and improved market visibility.

 

 

However, investing in a SPAC involves a level of trust in the management team, as the regulatory requirements are lower for SPACs. A registration statement for a SPAC describes a company with no operations, making it a speculative investment.

Direct Listing: Simplicity and Transparency

A direct listing is a straightforward and cost-effective approach to going public. In a direct listing, a company allows existing shareholders, including investors, employees, and co-founders, to sell shares directly to the public without the involvement of intermediaries like underwriters.

 

One of the primary advantages of a direct listing is its cost-effectiveness. It avoids the dilution of existing shareholder wealth and eliminates the need to issue new shares. Additionally, there is no lockup period, allowing for immediate liquidity.

 

A direct listing requires the company to meet specific requirements set by the exchange on which it plans to list. 

 

One potential downside of a direct listing is that it may not generate as much investor enthusiasm as an IPO, as there is no underwriter to conduct a roadshow or guarantee the sale of shares.

 
Buildings

Which Listing Process Is Best?

The choice between an IPO, SPAC, or direct listing depends on the needs and resources of the company. None of these methods guarantee success or failure; they are simply tools that are appropriate for different situations.

 

An IPO is ideal for companies looking to raise capital and create brand awareness, and it is often chosen by larger companies that can afford the associated costs.

 

SPACs offer speed and certainty in raising funds, attracting larger companies looking to go public, but they can involve significant transaction costs and equity dilution.

 

Direct listings are cost-effective and straightforward, but they may lack the marketing and support provided by underwriters, making them suitable for companies with strong brand recognition.

 

In the end, the health and prospects of the company going public matter more than the method chosen. Investors should carefully evaluate the financials, management team, and industry trends before investing in any early-stage company, regardless of how it goes public.

 

Conclusion

Choosing the right path to take your company public is a crucial decision. Each method, whether it’s an IPO, SPAC, or direct listing, comes with its unique characteristics and considerations. 

 

Understanding the advantages and drawbacks of each approach will help you make an informed decision about which option aligns best with your company’s goals and resources. 

 

Remember that a successful transition to the public market depends on factors beyond the method you choose, including the company’s financial health, management team, and industry trends. 

 

In this regard, it is always recommended for aspiring companies to engage a pre IPO advisory service to ensure they are in the best position to go public. 

Categories
Blog

Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) vs. Initial Public Offering (IPO): What is the difference?

Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) vs. Initial Public Offering (IPO): What is the difference?

A lot of organizations that want to go public have the common question of whether merging with a SPAC is better than an IPO and what are the main differences between a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) and an Initial public offering (IPO).

 

The benefits of both SPAC and IPO vary greatly from organization to organization. Private companies are likely to find more benefits in a SPAC merger, such as speed and price, but it has its own challenges as well. 

 

In this article, we will explore the differences between IPO and SPAC in detail. 

checking accounting mistake

What is Initial Public Offering (IPO)?

A typical approach for a business to receive capital from the general public is via an initial public offering (IPO).

 

An established business seeks to issue and sell shares on a public market via an IPO. There is already a corporation that is going public. 

 

Typically, a company will operate on private funds to build its business strategy, product, and service (raised from founders, private investors, loans, and various other sources). However, the resources made accessible by private capital are often somewhat constrained.

 

A business may obtain capital from a large pool of prospective investors by issuing an IPO. Offering stock shares for sale on the open market achieves this. 

 

The corporation itself sells its stock in this area, referred to as the main market. A business receives compensation for each share of stock sold on the open market.

 

What is a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC)?

Issuing an IPO is a traditional business practice. However, the concept of SPAC is relatively newer. SPAC is also known as the blank check company. 

 

It became highly popular in 2019 and 2020. With a SPAC, you create a shell company that exists only on paper. The company will have a management team, a bank, and some initial funding. 

 

Moreover, it involves going through the entire process of IPO readiness assessment and issuing the IPO in which the blank check company sells the shares to raise capital. 

 

Since SPAC does not have significant assets or working operations, the disclosure process for a SPAC in an IPO is quick and efficient. Professional accounting firms in Malaysia can help companies prepare and execute both SPAC and IPO efficiently.

 

Another way to understand SPAC is to think of it as a publicly-traded buyout company that raises money through an IPO to gain a controlling stake in an organization. After going public, SPAC typically has about two years to acquire one or more companies. 

 

Once a company is acquired by a SPAC, it goes public without paying for an IPO. Hence, it is a cost-efficient way of going public as all of the charges and underwriting fees are covered before the target company gets involved. 

 
Business meeting. High angle view.
cash flow vs profit-2

SPAC vs. IPO

It is evident that there are some distinct differences between SPAC and IPO. Experts have often criticized traditional IPO investors for having a short-term mindset that leads to mispricing and business inefficiencies. Such concerns are removed by SPAC. 

 

Even though SPAC is cost-friendly, it has some serious risks as well. A major risk is that the investors have the right to withdraw their investors if they are not happy with the target company. 

 

The management will identify the best acquisition, but if the investors change their minds later, it can be a significant loss. 

 

A major reason behind the rising popularity of SPAC is that its value is linked to how much money is raised from investors. Therefore, it is less vulnerable to the fluctuating situations of the market. Investors also say that a recession can lead to greater buying opportunities for SPACs.

 

Final Thoughts

Going public by launching an IPO or by merging with a SPAC are two of the most popular options for the majority of private companies. Ultimately, the choice depends on the type and scale of the business. Both IPO and SPAC have their own set of pros and cons. 

 

The current business landscape supports SPAC, but it is highly possible that an IPO might be a better option for a company. Therefore, it is important to rely on experts like the accounting firm in Malaysia to conduct IPO readiness assessments to make the best choice.